TORCH RIVER — Milton Township setting up officers denied a developer’s request to establish an RV park in Torch River village that designed waves amongst the neighbors for extra than a 12 months.
Township setting up commissioners on Tuesday night unanimously voted to deny a special use allow and site program for the 80-web site Torch River RV Park proposed by the landowner. The selection follows a consultant’s analyze that reviewed how current site visitors may possibly be influenced by the park and months of neighborhood-vast competition.
Opponents argued the layout would put much too quite a few campers in far too modest a area, foremost to more summertime site visitors congestion at Torch Lake’s southern end some others raised environmental concerns about septic and stormwater flow from the progress — particularly soon after two significant erosion occasions very last summer months through hefty thunderstorms that washed sediments on to neighboring home.
1 neighbor argued through this week’s meeting that denying the developer authorization to establish was very best for the full neighborhood.
RV park proponents have been “grasping at straws” for causes the development would profit the group, reported Mark Hatch, who also criticized the applicant for obvious-reducing the site without township acceptance.
The job developers are landowner Jim Brewer and organization husband or wife John Peal, owner of Torch River Marine.
Brewer reported his contractors have faced street rage and verbal abuse from neighbors, and the only do the job done on site has been stabilization efforts to meet up with county requirements.
Antrim County Soil Erosion Officer Heidi Shaffer confirmed the obvious-minimize web page led to erosion issues in the course of major rain situations previous year, and she considering the fact that OK’d a soil erosion permit to permit perform to prevent foreseeable future washouts, as previously claimed.
The afflicted neighbor entered mediation with the developer in excess of the washout damages.
Bill Hefferan, scheduling commission chairman, explained he is aware thoughts have been “running high” about this proposal, but how township officers individually come to feel was irrelevant. He also said it was critical for officials to make a decision on the software 1st submitted much more than 18 months back.
“Whoever has the most mates or the most money doesn’t make any difference. That’s not how this will work,” Hefferan reported.
In advance of voting, planning commissioners reviewed green belt problems, the quantity of park exits, and whether or not very clear-chopping function already done would meet up with a need for any progress to retain the purely natural character of the web site. Officials reported what did not transpire was a negotiated reduction in the number of proposed websites to protect that character.
Commissioners also debated whether or not to approve the specific use permit and web page program with problems, but opted in opposition to that due to the fact there would be a sizeable checklist to tick off.
Chris Weinzapfel, township zoning administrator, claimed commissioners ought to especially phrase any conditions they wanted satisfied.
But the organizing commissioners didn’t want to go after that route.
“I really don’t assume it’s my small business to establish anyone’s application,” Hefferan stated.
In the end, the commissioners voted to deny the ask for, and talked over the expectation of Brewer re-submitting a new internet site plan just after making improvements.
Brewer’s Traverse City-primarily based lawyer Andrew Blodgett claimed nothing about this process has been typical: a ton of again-and-forth with a subcommittee tasked with reviewing the prepare, and switching standards from thirty day period to month.
Blodgett argued it would not be “out of bounds” for planning commissioners to deliver specific disorders to be satisfied, fairly than building the applicant start about.
“We’ll be here for a calendar year once again,” he mentioned.
The arranging commission denied the application on the grounds that: it would disturb present and upcoming utilizes of the vicinity and community it would not be adequately served by general public services like fire defense it would not be certain a preserved atmosphere by reducing tree and soil elimination and, it would not comply with the township’s zoning.
The proposed RV park drew appreciable general public consideration, with additional than 50 contributors watching Tuesday’s meeting by means of on the net videocon- ferencing in addition to these who attended in particular person.
A 12 months back, more than 120 persons attended a community listening to on the proposal that took area in a neighborhood park to make it possible for for bodily distancing through the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most who spoke that working day stated they opposed the job.